Home
Estonia:
Minorities
Corruption
Judiciary

EU page

Judiciary:
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Topic pages:
Minorities
Corruption
Judiciary
Country pages:
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Lithuania
Poland
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
EU accession: the Copenhagen political criteria in ten Central and East European countries
Independence of the Judiciary in Estonia
On this page:
Legislation
Organisations
EU Opinions
Phare projects
    Estonia: 
Legislation 
Organisations 
EU 
Opinion of the European Commission 1997

The Judiciary: Structure 

The independence of Estonia's judiciary system is guaranteed. Judges are appointed for life by the President of the Republic on a proposal from the National Court and can only be dismissed if they are found guilty of a crime. Subject to the approval of the President of the Republic, the National Court is competent to hear complaints against magistrates of lower courts while Parliament hears complaints against judges of the National Court on referral by the "Chancellor of the Law".

The department of public prosecutions continues to fall under the authority of the Minister of Justice under the 1993 Law.

Administrative acts are scrutinised by the "Chancellor of the Law", who is elected by Parliament for seven years on a proposal from the President of the Republic. The "Chancellor of the Law" checks the constitutional conformity of government measures and local authority acts and can intervene where he deems they are unconstitutional. Where the authority refuses to amend them, he can refer the matter to the National Court.

Estonia has no ombudsman. A government bill introducing one is currently being considered.

Vetting for constitutionality is the task of the National Court, Estonia's supreme judicial authority, which hears appeals against the judgements of the lower courts and acts as Constitutional Court. Its President is elected by Parliament on a proposal from the President of the Republic. Its members are appointed by the President of the National Court himself. Matters can be brought before it by the President of the Republic, the "Chancellor of the Law" or private citizens. The National Court scrutinises laws for conformity with the Constitution and treaties.

Functioning of the Judiciary 

The major difficulties facing the justice system relate to uncertainty regarding the law applying in many areas of legislation and the inexperience of the magistracy (90% to 95% of judges have been replaced since independence).

In Estonia's institutions the National Court plays an important role in upholding democracy and the rule of law. Petitions addressed to it are rising in number, even though most of them are groundless.

Regular Report 1999

The Judiciary 

Although a series of reforms to improve the judicial system have been undertaken, Estonia needs to undertake further adjustments to its civil and penal legislation in order to complete the transition from the former system. Progress in this area is very slow. In the fields of commercial and civil law the reform has been delayed and the necessary legislation to complete this reform has not yet been adopted. The training of judges and elaboration of new penal legislation that meets European standards continue to remain top priorities for Estonia.
Currently, the caseload of the courts continues to be high relative to the number of judges.  Nineteen of the 238 positions for judges remain vacant.). The backlog in the courts (cases still to be  settled as the proportion of total cases) was 64% in the first half of 1999 (See chapter 4 on Administrative Capacity). The vacant posts reflect the unattractiveness of judicial salaries for qualified lawyers in contrast to those in the private sector. Most vacancies are for posts in the north-east part of Estonia. Nevertheless, salaries of judges are above the average in the public administration. Inexperienced judges continue to pose major difficulties for the judicial system. Justice in lower level courts continues to be unsatisfactory, as there are many new, inexperienced and overburdened judges. These problems affect mostly the application of civil law. Co-operation between the different authorities in the court system (police, prosecutors and judges) is weak which the subsequently weakens on the system's efficiency.
Measures which have been taken in this area, include the adoption of the Code of Administrative Court Procedure that will enter into force in January 2000 and the Statute of Prosecutor’s Office. Also, some measures to intensify the training of judges have been taken.

Phare
A search on the Phare Search Facility yields no programmes dealing with independence of the judiciary in Estonia.